tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19177268404829557412024-03-13T14:37:41.281-04:00Earth & EnergyNotes on energy and the environmentUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger139125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1917726840482955741.post-43630214168329776952015-02-11T06:00:00.000-05:002015-02-11T06:00:02.320-05:00House bill requires incineration for sludgeA Cabarrus County legislator wants to give his county a defense against Charlotte's sewage sludge, which some of his constituents have <a href="http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2014/11/14/5315306/charlottes-sludge-plan-brews-rural.html#.VNqX_PnF8p8">rallied against</a> in recent months.<br />
<br />
Rep. Larry Pittman, a Concord Republican, is among the primary sponsors of the <a href="http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/Sessions/2015/Bills/House/PDF/H61v1.pdf">bill </a>filed Tuesday. The bill lets counties that incinerate sludge -- that would be Cabarrus -- require that sludge be burned before it's spread as fertilizer on farm fields.<br />
<br />
Counties without incinerators could force an "alternate method" of sludge treatment to reduce disease-carrying pathogens and rodents.<br />
<br />
Charlotte Water's opponents in the Rowan-Cabarrus community of Gold Hill say they're more worried about heavy metals and toxic chemicals tainting soil and groundwater.<br />
<br />
The utility this month <a href="http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2015/02/05/5496362/charlotte-cancels-hotly-fought.html#.VNqTq_nF8p8">withdrew</a> an application to expand its sludge fields by 1,300 acres in Cabarrus, Rowan and Iredell counties. But its existing North Carolina permit expires March 31 and will have to be renewed, so could apparently be affected by the sludge bill.<br />
<br />
Charlotte Water canceled the request after the state cited a Rowan County property that would have been included in the expansion for environmental violations.<br />
<br />
Cabarrus County, meanwhile, cranked up a new, $20 million power plant fueled by sludge last October. The county landfills the ash that's left.<br />
<br />
Cabarrus says it would welcome Charlotte's sludge, but the city has said incineration is not a viable alternative for economic and other reasons.<br />
<br />
Pittman's Republican cosponsors are Rep. Carl Ford of Rowan County and Rep. Michael Speciale of Craven County. The bill now goes to the House Local Government committee, which Ford co-chairs, and if endorsed there to the Environment committee.<br />
<br />
<div style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; font-stretch: normal; height: 1px; margin-top: 0px; overflow: hidden; width: 1px;">
<br style="margin-top: 0px;" />Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2014/11/14/5315306/charlottes-sludge-plan-brews-rural.html#.VNqU6vnF8p8#storylink=cp </div>
Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1917726840482955741.post-44366058367866993892015-01-26T12:39:00.003-05:002015-01-26T12:39:45.506-05:00Duke scientists finds climate models inconsistentA Duke University-led study questions the reliability of the climate models used to project short-term swings in temperature and the future extent of warming.<br />
<br />
Patrick Brown, a Duke doctoral student in climatology, and two coauthors analyzed 34 models used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in its most <a href="http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/">recent report</a>, completed in November.<br />
<br />
Most of the models probably underestimate how much surface temperatures change from decade to decade, says the <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/enhanced/doi/10.1002/2014JD022576/">study</a> published last week in the Journal of Geophysical Research. The models also don't consistently explain why they vary, it says.<br />
<br />
That means too much emphasis shouldn't be placed on recent temperature trends, the study warns.<br />
<br />
"The inconsistencies we found among the models are a reality check showing we may not know as much as we thought we did," Brown said in a Duke release. He added that the findings don't mean the planet won't warm as greenhouse gases accumulate in the atmosphere.<br />
<br />
"It just means the road to a warmer world may be bumpier and less predictable, with more decade-to-decade wiggles than expected.... Don't assume that the reduced rate of global warming over the last 10 years foreshadows what the climate will be like in 50 or 100 years."<br />
<br />
Global surface temperatures rose quickly in the 1980s and 1990, but have stayed relatively stable since then.<br />
<br />
The National Climatic Data Center in Asheville reported that surface temperatures in 2014 were the warmest since record-keeping began in 1880. Nine of the 10 warmest years in that 135-year span have occurred in this century.<br />
<br />
Martin's coauthors were Wenhong Li of Duke's Nicholas School of the Environment and Shang-Ping Xie of the University of California San Diego.<br />
<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com17tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1917726840482955741.post-75667947598062065492015-01-22T06:00:00.000-05:002015-01-22T06:00:06.158-05:00Environmental Management Commission chair resignsBenne Hutson, the Charlotte lawyer who led North Carolina's environmental rule-making board, has resigned under the weight of time spent on state business.<br />
<br />
Sen. Thom Tillis was the N.C. House leader when he named Hutson, who practices environmental law, to the Environmental Management Commission in 2012. When the Republican-led legislature wiped the board clean the following year, Hutson was reappointed as chair.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-xMNZtXrqgCw/VMAe9pyG1GI/AAAAAAAAAoo/WQtZINBDdxg/s1600/IMG_Hutson.JPG_2_1_EB2C94VU_L57450698.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-xMNZtXrqgCw/VMAe9pyG1GI/AAAAAAAAAoo/WQtZINBDdxg/s1600/IMG_Hutson.JPG_2_1_EB2C94VU_L57450698.JPG" height="200" width="142" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Benne Hutson</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
That extended Hutson's initial two-year term to mid-2017. But he said the decision to resign was based on the 500 hours he spent on EMC business last year, including meetings, staff discussions and public talks. He spent 40 nights in Raleigh.<br />
<br />
"I can't commit the time to do the job and do it right," Hutson said. "I now have a real appreciation for the value of public service, and I have a much greater appreciation for the quality of the staff at DENR. They’re just really good."<br />
<br />
His resignation, effective last Thursday, comes as the Department of Environment and Natural Resources also roils its top management. Gov. Pat McCrory this month named longtime staff member Donald van der Vaart to replace John Skvarla as environment secretary. Van der Vaart promptly replaced assistant secretaries Mitch Gillespie, who will move to a post in Asheville, and Brad Ives, who left DENR.<br />
<br />
Under Hutson, the EMC undertook the business-friendly legislature's mandate to review environmental rules and delete those deemed unnecessary. Most of those reviewed so far, for surface water, wetlands and dry-cleaning businesses, are in the process of being readopted. But Hutson said commission members "really started raising questions" about whether proposed rules will work as intended.<br />
<br />
The commission also lost a court case over its interpretation of state rules on contaminated groundwater, a key issue in regulating Duke Energy's coal ash ponds. A Wake County judge last year reversed the EMC, in part, by ruling that the state can require "immediate action" to stop the source of contamination. The case is before the state Supreme Court.<br />
<br />
Hutson said he's spent time reaching out to skeptics of the Republican-dominated state government and tried to make the EMC's work transparent to the public.<br />
<br />
"If everybody has a chance to have their say, we may have disagreements at the end but it's not nearly as strident as it would have been," he said.<br />
<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1917726840482955741.post-34601773022697628882015-01-15T07:00:00.000-05:002015-01-15T07:00:04.905-05:00Duke Energy could recover ash disposal costs -- or notDuke Energy's costs of closing its North Carolina ash ponds could be passed to customers if it's a statutory requirement, the state Utilities Commission chairman says.<div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Chairman Edward Finley appeared Wednesday before the Coal Ash Management Commission to lay out how utility rates are set, a task that he noted has taken him a 40-year career to fully grasp.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Finley said other factors could weigh against Duke recovering disposal costs the company has estimated at up to $10 billion, such as whether Duke violated environmental standards. But he's making no predictions on what will happen.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
"I'm going to give you
no promises or no indications of what the Utilities Commission might do," he said. "That will all depend on the facts
of the case that is presented and the law that is argued to us."<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
State law allows utilities to recover through rates their "reasonable and prudent" costs, such as expenses for building power plants, from an earlier 12-month period. The utilities panel is charged with seeing that those costs are kept as low as possible.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
There are other ways utilities can recoup their costs. They're usually created by the legislature, such as riders that charge customers for expenses of the state's renewable-energy mandate. Duke was also allowed to recover the costs of installing air pollution controls under the 2002 Clean Smokestacks Act.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Ash pond closures under state orders "pretty well would insulate (utilities) in my opinion" in seeking recovery, Finley told the ash commission. The General Assembly last summer gave Duke a 15-year deadline to close its 33 ash ponds.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Duke hasn't decided when or how it will go to the Utilities Commission for recovery, said spokesman Jeff Brooks. Duke has said customers won't pay the costs of cleaning up its spill into the Dan River last February. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
"Closure of basins is part of the normal life cycle of the plant, and the costs for operation and decommissioning and closure of our sites typically has been recovered through customer rates," Brooks said.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
</div>
</div>
Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1917726840482955741.post-19047470127965071062015-01-09T15:46:00.003-05:002015-01-09T15:46:42.714-05:00Hellbenders survive fungus, but pollution takes a tollThere's good news and bad about one of the strangest creatures to haunt the river bottoms of Western North Carolina -- the two-foot salamander called the hellbender.<div>
<br /></div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-OsO9ygS8-Jk/VLA7yh1862I/AAAAAAAAAn0/q2TJLiMIIOg/s1600/hellbender.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-OsO9ygS8-Jk/VLA7yh1862I/AAAAAAAAAn0/q2TJLiMIIOg/s1600/hellbender.jpg" height="234" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Eastern hellbender (N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission)</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div>
A <a href="http://www.herpconbio.org/Volume_9/Issue_3/Williams_Groves_2014.pdf">paper</a> published last week found that the <a href="http://www.savethefrogs.com/threats/chytrid/">chytrid fungus</a> that has devastated amphibians worldwide is widespread in mountain waters. But the fungus doesn't appear to be taking a toll on North Carolina's hellbenders. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Tempering that news is that the giant, flat-bodied salamanders continue a steady decline as they lose clean, clear water. Silt and sediment pouring into rivers smother the niches where hellbenders lurk.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
In North Carolina, Eastern hellbenders are found only in rivers that drain to the Gulf of Mexico. They lurk under large submerged rocks and trees, feeding mostly on crayfish. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<div>
Biologist Lori Williams of the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and co-author John Groves of the North Carolina Zoo found that about one-quarter of the 165 wild and 15 captive hellbenders they tested carry chytrid fungal spores. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
They saw no evidence the fungus is causing the immune problems or inability to heal wounds that's been documented in the Ozark hellbenders of Missouri and Arkansas.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
</div>
<div>
A lingering problem in North Carolina is that some people continue to kill the animals on sight, Williams said. The myth handed down over generations is that the slimy amphibians -- sometimes known as "devil dogs" or "snot otters" -- are poisonous.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
"I've even been told they're bad luck," Williams says, with fishermen who inadvertently snag one liable to throw away their gear.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
It's illegal to kill hellbenders because North Carolina lists them as a species of special concern. The Center for Biological Diversity, an advocacy group, has petitioned for federal protection under the Endangered Species Act.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<div>
The paper was published Dec. 31 in the journal Herpetological Conservation and Biology.</div>
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1917726840482955741.post-40416801937560624092015-01-05T17:03:00.001-05:002015-01-05T17:03:32.279-05:00Utilities panel keeps status quo on green-energy ratesNorth Carolina's Utilities Commission has opted not to change the way utilities calculate the rates they have to offer private developers for renewable energy.<br />
<br />
Last week's <a href="http://starw1.ncuc.net/NCUC/ViewFile.aspx?Id=4d85c17b-ef0a-4dc4-a0fd-c84d4f39ef80">order </a>stabilizes, for now, the economic climate under which commercial solar farms are built. North Carolina ranks fourth nationally for solar capacity, the Solar Energy Industries Association says.<br />
<br />
Utilities base the rates they pay for green energy on what are called <a href="http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2014/07/04/5024475/utilities-panel-mulls-the-cost.html#.VKr-LivF8p8">avoided costs</a>. In North Carolina's case, that's the cost of building gas-fired power plants to meet periods of peak demand for electricity.<br />
<br />
Duke Energy says the "peaker" method results in its paying too much for solar power. Solar developers say it pays them too little. The commission took a middle ground, keeping the current method.<br />
<br />
The order retained the threshold for standardized purchase contracts, which don't have to be individually negotiated, at 5 megawatts and smaller. Duke had argued that the threshold should be reduced to 100 kilowatts.<br />
<br />
The commission also kept the maximum contract term at 15 years, turning aside green-energy arguments for longer contract terms and utility pleas for shorter ones.<br />
<br />
"It looks like the status quo carried the day, which probably means it's going to be a good year for solar," said Duke spokesman Randy Wheeless. The state's renewable-energy tax credit, a powerful incentive behind solar's expansion, will expire Dec. 31 unless legislators renew it.<br />
<br />
Said the North Carolina Sustainable Energy Association: <span style="font-family: inherit;">"<span style="background-color: white; color: #222222;">By making this finding and rejecting the monopoly power companies’ efforts to roll back the established policy, the commission itself recognized we’re better off with clean energy. North Carolina customers and the economy are the real winners under the commission's order." </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222;">The Utilities Commission is now taking comments on how to relieve a congested queue of proposed solar projects. <a href="http://starw1.ncuc.net/NCUC/ViewFile.aspx?Id=36440fc7-ce3b-407e-ae01-b3eddacc167a">Utilities say</a> more than 700 proposals are now before them, many of which will never be built. </span></span><br />
<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1917726840482955741.post-27318345981036580412014-12-19T11:14:00.001-05:002014-12-19T11:14:23.663-05:00Chatham County opposes Duke's ash disposalChatham County commissioners cited "substantial health and environmental risks" this week in opposing Duke Energy's plan to dump coal ash into open-pit clay mines.<br />
<br />
Commissioners adopted a resolution against Duke's plan, announced last month, to send 2.9 million tons of ash to mines in Chatham and Lee counties.<br />
<br />
Lee County officials have said they want the county to be compensated for taking the waste, likening it to host fees typically paid for regional solid waste landfills.<br />
<br />
The Chatham <a href="file:///C:/Users/bhenderson/Downloads/DRAFT%20RESOLUTION%20OPPOSING%20COAL%20ASH%20DISPOSAL%20IN%20CHATHAM%20COUNTY%20(1).pdf">resolution</a> says the plan would expose residents to risks from potentially toxic elements in ash. It identifies "shortcomings" in the legislation this year that ordered Duke to close its 32 ash ponds, including lack of local control over ash disposal and fees.<br />
<br />
Duke has said it needs to move quickly to meet deadlines set out in the legislation. The initial phase of work would move ash from four power plants, including Riverbend west of Charlotte, starting early next year.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1917726840482955741.post-18684564887338415842014-12-16T12:39:00.001-05:002014-12-16T12:39:21.709-05:00Duke scientists develop coal ash tracersDuke University researchers said Tuesday they have developed a <a href="http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es503746v">new tool</a> to tell when water is contaminated by coal ash and not by other sources.<br />
<br />
Regulators will be able to "trace the coal ash effluents to their source," Avner Vengosh, a Duke professor of geochemistry and water quality, said in a statement.<br />
<br />
The research is timely for North Carolina, where contaminated groundwater has been found at all 14 of Duke Energy's coal-fired power plants and seepage reported from ash pond dams. What hasn't been clear is whether the contamination came from ash or natural sources.<br />
<br />
Duke, under the legislature's orders, is drilling hundreds of new wells at its plants to detect the extent, flow and sources of contaminated groundwater.<br />
<br />
Chemical variations have previously been used to identify ash contaminants. The forensic tracers Duke University developed are based on the distinctive characteristics of two elements found in ash, boron and strontium.<br />
<br />
The isotopes in boron that come from coal ash always differ from naturally-occurring boron, said Laura Ruhl, a former Duke graduate student now teaching at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock. Strontium is less distinct, she said, but using the two elements together provides "definitive evidence" whether contamination is from ash.<br />
<br />
Vengosh and Ruhl published their findings this week in the peer-reviewed journal Environmental Science & Technology. Co-authors included Gary Dwyer and Heileen Hsu-Kim of Duke and James Hower of the University of Kentucky.<br />
<br />
<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1917726840482955741.post-25863654125350688772014-12-01T13:39:00.000-05:002014-12-01T14:30:36.426-05:00Dan River bottom life is thriving, DENR saysNorth Carolina's environmental agency says bugs "appear to be thriving" at the bottom of the Dan River downstream of Duke Energy's February coal ash spill.<br />
<br />
Department of Environment and Natural Resources staff sampled upriver and about two miles downriver of the spill on Oct. 28. It was DENR's first testing of the aquatic insects, worms and other invertebrates at the base of the food chain. Their numbers, type and diversity signal a river's overall health.<br />
<br />
Findings were similar in both places and had the highest biological rating, the department said.<br />
<br />
Tests of water quality, river sediment and fish tissue are continuing. The results will be factored into a natural resource damage assessment that state and federal agencies are conducting.<br />
<br />
Biologists have said that river-bottom creatures were likely smothered by up to 39,000 tons of ash that Duke's Dan River power plant dumped into 70 miles of river.<br />
<br />
Operations to suck up the deposits got only 3,000 tons of ash and sediment. Duke and the Environmental Protection Agency said trying to retrieve all the ash would do more ecological harm than leaving it in place.<br />
<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1917726840482955741.post-84833033141796378562014-11-21T07:00:00.000-05:002014-11-21T07:00:09.426-05:00Judge's orders set stage for N.C. v. Alcoa trialA federal judge has issued a couple of orders in North Carolina's legal wrangle with Alcoa over ownership of the bed of the Yadkin River, in a prelude to a trial early next year.<br />
<br />
The aluminum giant and the state, you'll recall, have fought for years over renewal of Alcoa's hydroelectric license for 40 miles of the Yadkin east of Charlotte. The state has argued Alcoa doesn't deserve free access to the state's resources after shuttering its Badin smelting plant.<br />
<br />
Things got more interesting when North Carolina asserted that the state, not Alcoa, owns the riverbed under the Yadkin. Alcoa, which dammed the river nearly a century ago, claims it has longstanding title.<br />
<br />
U.S. District Judge Terrence Boyle issued an order Thursday on motions for summary judgment from both sides, granting some and denying others. He instructed both sides to be ready for trial on Jan. 15.<br />
<br />
Ryke Longest, director of the Environmental Law and Policy Clinic at Duke University's law school, said Boyle made a couple of noteworthy decisions. Longest represents the Yadkin Riverkeeper, a former party to the case.<br />
<br />
Most importantly, he said, the judge granted North Carolina's motion that it made a prima facie -- correct until proven otherwise -- case for ownership of the riverbed. That shifts the burden to Alcoa to prove at trial that it holds title.<br />
<br />
Boyle denied Alcoa's claims that the company owns the riverbed by virtue of its long occupation there. He also ruled against Alcoa's argument that the river was not navigable at the time North Carolina became a state. States own the beds of navigable rivers, other courts have held.<br />
<br />
In a second order, Boyle denied Alcoa's motion to strike the affidavits of four expert witnesses for the state, meaning they will likely be able to testify at trial. <br />
<br />
"What it means is we're going to have a very interesting trial starting in January," Longest said.<br />
<br />
<h3 style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #001757; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 24px; font-stretch: inherit; font-weight: normal; line-height: 1.3; margin: 0px 0px 10px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;">
<br /></h3>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1917726840482955741.post-92014356097239398122014-11-18T07:00:00.000-05:002014-11-18T07:00:06.385-05:00State approves new metals limits in waterNorth Carolina's Environmental Management Commission has approved long-overdue water quality standards that stiffen limits on metals, which can be toxic to fish and other aquatic life.<br />
<br />
Federal law requires the updates every three years to recognize research on pollutants' effects. North Carolina is four years late, a delay state officials blame on the complexity of the standards and policy changes that made it harder to enact new rules.<br />
<br />
The changes won't take effect until the Environmental Protection Agency approves, and EPA has already <a href="http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2014/07/13/5041866/nc-plays-catch-up-on-water-standards.html#.VGqAXfnF8p8">signaled some concerns</a>.<br />
<br />
The standards include a provision called the "biological trump" that allows some concentrations of metals to exceed the limits if there's no evidence aquatic life has been harmed.<br />
<br />
EPA says biological studies are of little use in preventing water pollution and don't replace the need to enforce pollutant limits. We'll update when EPA rules.<br />
<br />
<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1917726840482955741.post-70410974031590229202014-11-07T12:45:00.001-05:002014-11-07T12:45:38.721-05:00Environmental advocates launch coal ash siteThe Southern Alliance for Clean Energy and its partners have added an interactive tool to their <a href="http://www.southeastcoalash.org/">website</a> about the 450 coal ash ponds spread across nine states.<br />
<br />
The site can now generate <a href="http://www.southeastcoalash.org/?page_id=5830">power plant-specific</a> reports with data on coal ash capacity, dam hazard ratings and known contamination.<br />
<br />
The feature was added as the Environmental Protection Agency prepares to release the first federal rules on ash in December. The agency's key decision will be whether to regulate ash as hazardous waste. EPA rules to be released next September, on wastewater discharges from power plants, could also limit use of ash ponds.<br />
<br />
The coal-intensive Southeast was the scene of the two spills that drew federal attention to coal ash regulation -- the first by the Tennessee Valley Authority in 2008, followed by Duke Energy's spill into North Carolina and Virginia's Dan River in February.<br />
<br />
The alliance worked with Appalachian Voices, the North Carolina Conservation Network and the Southern Environmental Law Center on the site.<br />
<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1917726840482955741.post-29749096380658746612014-09-15T15:39:00.000-04:002014-09-15T15:39:24.177-04:00Faulty shale-gas wells contaminate water, study findsPoorly constructed shale gas wells, not hydraulic fracturing, are to blame for contaminated water in Pennsylvania and Texas, says a study by scientists at Duke University and four other schools.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
The <a href="http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2014/09/12/1322107111">study</a> was published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Researchers analyzed the gas content of more than 130 drinking water wells over the Marcellus shale formation in Pennsylvania and Texas' Barnett shale. They found contamination in eight clusters of wells. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Hydraulic fracturing extracts gas from deep underground. The suspicion has been that methane -- the main component of natural gas -- from fracking or horizontal drilling had migrated up into drinking water aquifers.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
The new study appears to rule that out. Instead it found, in four contaminated clusters, that the methane leaked at shallow depths from faulty rings of cement around gas-well shafts. Three more clusters suggested methane leaked through bad well casings.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
While drilling has contaminated water, the scientists say, most of the causes can be prevented.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
The researchers used noble gases such as helium to trace methane emissions because they mix with natural gas but aren't affected by microbes or oxidation. Measuring the noble gases determined the source of the methane and how it reaches drinking water aquifers. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Scientists from Duke, Ohio State University, Stanford University, Dartmouth College and the University of Rochester took part in the peer-reviewed study. Funding came from the National Science Foundation and Duke's Nicholas School of the Environment.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
</div>
Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1917726840482955741.post-15364086141309734942014-09-11T11:29:00.000-04:002014-09-11T11:29:05.509-04:00Opposition forming to Atlantic Coast PipelineForces against the natural gas pipeline from West Virginia to Eastern North Carolina, announced last week, are quickly mustering.<br />
<br />
A coalition of 22 conservation groups have formed the <a href="http://www.abralliance.org/">Allegheny-Blue Ridge Alliance</a>. The groups say the pipeline <a href="https://www.dom.com/business/gas-transmission/atlantic-coast-pipeline/pdf/acp-generic-map.pdf">route </a>would disrupt ecologically sensitive areas, including parts of the Monongahela and George Washington national forests in West Virginia and Virginia.<br />
<br />
The route would cross karst topography formed by soluble rocks such as limestone that form underground drainage systems, the alliance says, placing water supplies at risk.<br />
<br />
Supervisors in Nelson County, Va., which includes part of the George Washington forest, <a href="http://www.timesdispatch.com/news/state-regional/nelson-county-supervisors-formally-oppose-pipeline/article_edac64fa-3946-11e4-886b-001a4bcf6878.html">passed a resolution</a> opposing the pipeline on Tuesday.<br />
<br />
Duke Energy and Charlotte's Piedmont Natural Gas, which solicited proposals for the <a href="http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2014/09/02/5144589/dominion-to-build-and-operate.html#.VBG07fldVUM">$5 billion line</a>, last week said Richmond-based Dominion Resources would build and operate it. The line, which needs federal approval, would tap gas deposits in the Marcellus and Utica shale basins.<br />
<br />
The 42-inch diameter pipeline in West Virginia and Virginia would require a construction right-of-way 125 feet wide and a permanent easement 75 feet wide, Dominion says. In North Carolina, a smaller 36-inch pipe would need rights-of-way 110 feet and 50 feet wide.<br />
<br />
Dominion says it expects to complete the route planning by December, with construction of the line in 2017 and 2018.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.dom.com/business/gas-transmission/atlantic-coast-pipeline/pdf/acp-open-house-schedule.pdf">Open houses</a> will start Monday at points along the pipeline route in all three states.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1917726840482955741.post-67471817149276562912014-09-04T14:22:00.000-04:002014-09-04T14:22:13.172-04:00The other end of that new gas pipeline Remember the news, a couple of days ago, that Duke Energy and Piedmont Natural Gas will partner on a new natural gas pipeline into Eastern North Carolina?<br />
<br />
The Energy Information Administration <a href="http://www.eia.gov/energy_in_brief/article/shale_in_the_united_states.cfm">published </a>a chart today that illustrates the rich shale-gas reserves the Atlantic Coast Pipeline would tap. Pay special attention to the vast Marcellus basin in green. Gas would also come from the much smaller Utica shale, in red.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/Up7Y0L-ugyVXeHiC5LgwAizkBOHdemyfeFaA4jTvfPzXymYedpgG3KXCPtPLOU69t0o-Wpdq4koE54EUucEUTC1loWCguutNETauxtCzqhzVqxHG45ehjTdBeEYoW1GTwXZU-_Fe1A=s0-d-e1-ft#http://www.eia.gov/energy_in_brief/images/charts/u.s.dry_shale_gas_production.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="290" src="https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/Up7Y0L-ugyVXeHiC5LgwAizkBOHdemyfeFaA4jTvfPzXymYedpgG3KXCPtPLOU69t0o-Wpdq4koE54EUucEUTC1loWCguutNETauxtCzqhzVqxHG45ehjTdBeEYoW1GTwXZU-_Fe1A=s0-d-e1-ft#http://www.eia.gov/energy_in_brief/images/charts/u.s.dry_shale_gas_production.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
Hydraulic fracturing -- fracking -- and horizontal drilling explain the explosion in production from shale reserves. The controversial drilling techniques also raise questions about the potential for groundwater contamination, overuse of water supplies, wastewater disposal and the impact of fracking chemicals.<br />
<br />
While the pipeline would deliver gas from several states away, the fracking debate is upon us too. Hearings began last month on North Carolina's version of <a href="http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/mining-and-energy-commission/draft-rules">fracking rules</a>, and legislators decided that permits could be issued next spring.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1917726840482955741.post-16018879199564052502014-08-28T18:13:00.000-04:002014-08-28T18:13:18.432-04:00NC 10th nationally for 2Q clean energy jobsNorth Carolina ranked 10th nationally for clean energy and transportation jobs in the second quarter, the business group <a href="http://cleanenergyworksforus.org/">Environmental Entrepreneurs</a> said Thursday.<br />
<br />
A <a href="http://www.e2.org/ext/doc/E2_Q2_2014_JobsReport.pdf">report </a>from the group says 272 new jobs, highest among states in the Southeast, were created by four announcements in the state.<br />
<br />
The 12,500 jobs created nationally more than doubled the results from the first quarter, the group said. It attributed that to "new confidence about future clean energy growth" linked to the Environmental Protection Agency's carbon limits on power plants, announced in June.<br />
<br />
Solar energy led all sectors with 5,300 U.S. jobs in the second quarter, followed by 2,700 in wind and major electric-car announcements by Tesla and General Motors.<br />
<br />
Arizona led all states in new jobs, followed by California.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1917726840482955741.post-24205518403570229652014-08-14T07:00:00.000-04:002014-08-14T07:00:02.923-04:00EPA adds to NC's polluted-water list The Environmental Protection Agency has added to <a href="http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=d61a8974-6af6-4edb-829f-e658935e3341&groupId=38364">North Carolina's list</a> of polluted waterways, saying the state should have included 52 more bodies of water than it did.<br />
<br />
States have to update the so-called 303(d) list of impaired waters every two years. But EPA <a href="http://www.epa.gov/region4/water/tmdl/northcarolina/documents/nc_2014_303d_decision_package.pdf">objected</a> to new methodology the state Environmental Management Commission adopted to update this year's list.<br />
<br />
EPA added back to the state's list 52 river and stream segments that are impaired by metals, which can be toxic to fish and humans. The additions include Mecklenburg County's Irwin Creek, where the water contains lead and zinc.<br />
<br />
EPA spokeswoman Dawn Harris-Young said adding to a state list is "not common, but it is not an unusual occurrence." EPA added one segment to North Carolina's 2012 list, state officials say.<br />
<br />
The state environment commission last year raised the bar for proving that waterways are impaired.<br />
<br />
Under the old standard, more than 10 percent of water samples had to show elevated levels of contaminants to be deemed impaired. The commission added a requirement that sample results be shown to be accurate at a 90 percent confidence level.<br />
<br />
Establishing that confidence level meant analyzing more water samples. The N.C. Division of Water Resources moved some water bodies, for which it lacked the additional data, from "impaired" to "inconclusive."<br />
<br />
The EPA objected, adding those waterways back to the list. It will take public comment on the additions through Sept. 12 -- email <a href="mailto:hopkins.marion@epa.gov">hopkins.marion@epa.gov</a>.<br />
<br />
EPA approved the state's listing of nearly 1,200 water bodies as impaired, and the removal of 227.<br />
<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1917726840482955741.post-33624031785895056852014-07-30T07:00:00.000-04:002014-07-30T07:00:00.927-04:00NC Wildlife Federation announces award winnersThe North Carolina Wildlife Federation has announced the winners of the annual Governor's Conservation Achievement Awards.<br />
<br />
The federation has presented the awards since 1958. This year's awards will also induct environmental philanthropist Fred Stanback of Salisbury into the Conservation Hall of Fame. Stanback previously was named Conservationist of the Year in 2005.<br />
<br />
Award winners will be honored at a Sept. 6 banquet in Cary:<br />
<br />
<ul>
<li>Conservationist of the Year: Jean Beasley of Topsail Island for her work with sea turtles</li>
<li>Wildlife Conservationist: Robert Curry, chief of inland fisheries for the N.C. Wildlife Commission in Raleigh</li>
<li>Sportsman: Bryan Perry of Zebulon for his work with wild turkeys</li>
<li>Land Conservationist: Jamin Simmons, a farmer from Fairfield who embraces innovation</li>
<li>Water Conservationist: Roger Dick of Albemarle for his defense of rivers, lakes and public access</li>
<li>Environmental Educator: Shaefny Grays of Morrisville for a mentoring program at N.C. State University's College of Natural Resources</li>
<li>Conservation Communicator: Joe Albea of Winterville for his advocacy of wildlife on public television and other media</li>
<li>Youth Conservationist: Rachel Hopkins, a student in Raleigh who advocates for nongame species</li>
<li>Legislator: Rep. Chuck McGrady of Hendersonville for his attention to conservation</li>
<li>Municipal Conservationist: The City of Jacksonville for showcasing the New River</li>
<li>Wildlife Volunteer: John Spruill of Hampstead for fighting for wildlife, farms and wild lands in Eastern North Carolina</li>
<li>Hunter Safety Educator: Stony Rushing of Wingate for helping underserved hunters</li>
<li>NCWF Chapter: Habitat and Wildlife Keepers in Matthews, which turned its community green</li>
<li>NCWF Affiliate: North Carolina Hunters for the Hungry, whose volunteers process and donate venison</li>
<li>Natural Resources Scientist: Christopher Moorman of Raleigh for his work with wildlife-friendly forestry</li>
<li>Conservation Organization: Quality Deer Management Association for combining hunting with conservation</li>
<li>Business Conservationist: The Webb Farm of Ellerbe for work with quail hunting on a family farm</li>
<li>Wildlife Enforcement Officer: Master Officer Robert Newsome of Marion for merging law enforcement with public outreach</li>
<li>Marine Fisheries Enforcement Officer: Sgt. Carter Witten of Havelock for leading special enforcement projects in Eastern North Carolina.</li>
</ul>
<br />
<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1917726840482955741.post-65981574009592420952014-07-25T16:43:00.001-04:002014-07-25T16:43:23.810-04:00Enviro groups unhappy with ash legislationSeveral environmental groups wrote N.C. Senate leader Phil Berger and House speaker Thom Tillis on Friday to complain about the coal ash legislation now before a legislative conference committee.<br />
<br />
Legislation adopted by both chambers sets Duke Energy on a 15-year timeline to drain each of its 33 ash ponds in North Carolina. <a href="http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2014/07/03/5022232/nc-house-approves-coal-ash-bill.html#.U9LATvldVUM">Differences between the two</a> include House changes that allow extensions to the timeline and changes in how groundwater contamination is defined. Neither says whether consumers would pay to clean up the ponds.<br />
<br />
House and Senate members say their work puts North Carolina at the forefront of states in dealing with ash and predict it will serve as a national cleanup model.<br />
<br />
But the environmental groups wrote that "the current legislation inexplicably attempts to weaken our state's existing groundwater protection laws in favor of Duke Energy while allowing Duke to continue polluting state waters and putting our communities at risk."<br />
<br />
The letter was signed by the Southern Environmental Law Center, which represents groups in litigation against Duke, and representatives of 11 advocacy groups including Charlotte's Catawba Riverkeeper Foundation.<br />
<br />
It listed three "fundamental problems" with the legislation:<br />
<br />
<br />
<ul>
<li>Ash is required to be removed from ponds at only four of Duke's 14 coal-fired power plants in the state. The groups say ash could stay in place, near water it could contaminate, at the remaining 10 plants.</li>
</ul>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<ul>
<li>House members inserted language they said was intended to prevent over-broad interpretations of a judge's order this year that state law requires "immediate action" to eliminate sources of groundwater pollution. Advocates say the change "is a clear effort to gut that requirement."</li>
</ul>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<ul>
<li>The bill allows Duke the option of bringing unpermitted leaks from its coal ash dams under existing permits. </li>
</ul>
<br />
<br />
"In short, the bill as written actually weakens North Carolina's protections against coal ash pollution, which is alarming given the recent disaster at the Dan River facility and frequent assurances that this bill would provide strong protections for our citizens," the groups wrote. "It is not too late to make good on those promises."<br />
<br />
Rep. Chuck McGrady and Sen. Tom Apodaca, both Republicans from Hendersonville, are the respective leads for ash legislation in the House and Senate and are expected to try to arrive at a compromise bill. No word when it will appear.<br />
<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1917726840482955741.post-52918778115968552582014-07-17T17:01:00.000-04:002014-07-17T17:01:18.466-04:00Duke Energy Carolinas slips in customer surveyDuke Energy Carolinas, which serves the Charlotte region, slipped in this year's J.D. Power and Associates <a href="http://www.jdpower.com/sites/default/files/2014109%20Electric%20Utility%20Residential%20Customer%20Satisfaction%20Study_Final.pdf">customer-satisfaction survey</a> of electric utility residential customers.<br />
<br />
Duke Carolinas scored 641 on a 1,000-point scale, according to results out this week. That ranked it ninth-highest among 13 large utilities in the South.<br />
<br />
In 2013 Duke had 656 points, ranking sixth-highest. In 2012 its 637 points ranked ninth.<br />
<br />
A coal ash spill into the Dan River and subsequent federal grand jury investigation couldn't have helped Duke in the rankings, which are based in part on corporate citizenship.<br />
<br />
But that wasn't the driving factor in the ratings drop, said J.D. Power official Jeff Conklin. More important, he said, were responses to survey questions about power quality and reliability, and about price. Duke Carolinas has raised rates three times since 2009.<br />
<br />
Duke Energy Progress, the utility that serves Raleigh and the eastern Carolinas, did even worse in the survey. Its 637 points this year put it in 11th place in the region. That's a drop from 2012, before the merger of Duke Energy and Progress Energy, when the utility then known as Progress Energy Carolinas ranked sixth.<br />
<br />
The survey measures customer satisfaction in six areas: power quality and reliability; price; billing and payment; corporate citizenship; communications and customer service.<br />
<br />
Results nationwide showed improved ratings, J.D. Power said, due to improvements in corporate behavior and communicating with customers about outages. But electric utilities still lag in customer satisfaction compared to other home services such as cable TV and Internet providers.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1917726840482955741.post-11638766660200942192014-07-08T11:02:00.000-04:002014-07-08T11:02:09.464-04:00Public supports ban on coyote shooting in red wolf territoryPublic comments favor, by a wide margin, a ban on hunting coyotes in red-wolf territory as the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission meets Thursday to discuss the issue.<br />
<br />
In May a federal judge ordered the state to end its open season on coyotes in the five coastal counties -- Dare, Tyrell, Hyde, Beaufort and Washington -- roamed by the rare wolves, which resemble coyotes. Temporary rules the commission has proposed put the injunction in effect.<br />
<br />
Rising numbers of gunshot wolves, often when they're mistaken for coyotes, threaten the species' survival on the Albemarle Peninsula of northeastern North Carolina, federal biologists say. Between 90 and 110 wolves live in the area.<br />
<br />
Public comments the commission solicited found that 3,108 agree with the ban and just 69 disagree. That doesn't count form letters from members of the Southern Environmental Law Center, whose clients sued to stop coyote hunting, and Safari Club International.<br />
<br />
More than 40 people submitted comments at a public hearing in Columbia on June 19.<br />
<br />The rules would take effect Aug. 1, but U.S. District Judge Terrence Boyle has said he would revisit his injunction six months after he made the ruling.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com13tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1917726840482955741.post-86508762999569938112014-03-21T15:40:00.002-04:002014-03-21T15:40:58.617-04:00Duke presses for answer on hydro licenseDuke Energy is pressing federal regulators to issue a new hydroelectric license for the Catawba River that is now five years overdue and snarled in legal limbo.<br />
<br />
The license gives Duke authority to operate its 13 dams on the Catawba in both Carolinas. The original 50-year license expired in 2008.<br />
<br />
Environmentalists challenged the renewal terms, saying Duke's dams would hurt the recovery of endangered shortnose and Atlantic sturgeon. That issue appears to have been resolved last year when a federal agency agreed the dams wouldn't threaten the survival of the fish.<br />
<br />
South Carolina has posed a thornier challenge. Duke can renew its federal license only after the state agrees that the dams won't hurt the Catawba's water quality.<br />
<br />
South Carolina initially refused to make that finding amid the turmoil of a U.S. Supreme Court case, later settled, between the two states over rights to the river.<br />
<br />
Now before South Carolina's Supreme Court is whether the S.C. Department of Health and Environmental Control suspended a 180-day deadline to act on the water-quality certification.<br />
<br />
This week Duke asked the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to ignore the court case, saying it could take years to resolve. Duke asked FERC to rule that South Carolina has waived its right to grant or deny the water certification.<br />
<br />
"The commission has a federal mandate to act now and it has everything it needs to do so," Duke wrote. "... Every licensee and every license application deserves due process and continued delays are not warranted for this project."<br />
<br />
Approval will unleash millions of dollars in recreational improvements and land conservation Duke promised in negotiating the license terms.<br />
<br />
Silence so far from FERC.<br />
<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1917726840482955741.post-5580180109377367402014-01-23T07:00:00.000-05:002014-01-23T07:00:04.979-05:00Are insect-ravaged hemlocks at a tipping point?<a href="http://www.nps.gov/grsm/naturescience/images/HWA.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://www.nps.gov/grsm/naturescience/images/HWA.jpg" height="200" width="161" /></a>A Japanese insect called the hemlock woolly adelgid has devastated Southern Appalachian hemlock forests, but apparently not to the degree expected, new research shows.<br />
<br />
The U.S. Forest Service released a <a href="http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/jrnl/2013/nrs_2013_trotter_002.pdf">study</a> Wednesday that says the majestic trees might still be growing fast enough in the East to offset the insect's damage.<br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.na.fs.fed.us/fhp/hwa/">adelgid </a>was first spotted in Virginia in the 1950s. By 1980, damage had begun in the hemlock's Appalachian range running from northern Georgia to Canada. Trees were hit hardest in the South, where mild winters don't help limit the insect's spread.<br />
<br />
Lead author Talbot Trotter, an ecologist at the service's Northern Research Station in Pennsylvania, says the study might have captured a tipping point between hemlock losses and increases due to forest regrowth. The study used forest data only through 2007.<br />
<br />
"Repeating this analysis as new (forest) data becomes available may show if we are beyond a tipping point and are now losing hemlock," he said.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com11tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1917726840482955741.post-38669164755692104342014-01-07T16:35:00.003-05:002014-01-08T12:58:05.007-05:00Gas prices to drop, solar to rise, feds sayThe Energy Information Administration's new <a href="http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/steo/">short-term energy outlook</a> forecasts some interesting trends through 2015. Some bullet points from administrator Adam Sieminski:<br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #222222;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">-- Gasoline prices are expected to trend downward over the next two years, averaging $3.46 per gallon in 2014 and $3.39 per gallon in 2015, as U.S. crude oil production grows and crude prices fall.</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222;">-- U.S. crude oil production could set a record in 2015 with the highest output since 1972. Production is projected to rise </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222;">by 1 million barrels a day this year to 8.5 million barrels, and then rise to 9.3 million barrels per day in 2015. Imports would drop to 24 percent of total liquid fuels consumption, the low</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222;">est level since 1970.</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #222222;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit;">-- Onshore <span style="background-color: white; color: #222222;">natural gas production will continue increasing over the next two years, with the Marcellus Shale of eastern North America offsetting declines in the Gulf of Mexico.</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #222222;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222;"> -- Average household electricity use is expected to decline </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222;">1.1 percent this year and another 0.4 percent in 2015 due to improved</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222;"> appliance and lighting efficiency. Dropping household use will be offset by increased demand from industries.</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #222222;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit;">-- U.S.<span style="background-color: white; color: #222222;"> wind power capacity is forecast to increase 8.8 percent this year and 15 percent in 2015. But utility-scale solar capacity is expected to zoom up</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222;"> 40 percent between now and the end of 2015.</span></span><br />
<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1917726840482955741.post-15892513129569408922013-12-11T07:00:00.000-05:002013-12-11T07:00:12.108-05:00Duke Energy silent on ALEC tiesDuke Energy isn't saying whether it's a member of the American Legislative Exchange Council, known as ALEC, the conservative, state-level policy group that is a frequent target of the left.<br />
<br />
The British newspaper The Guardian released <a href="https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.documentcloud.org/documents/841593/alec-docs.pdf">internal documents</a> last week that list Duke as a lapsed ALEC member. ALEC counts as members nearly one-third of North Carolina's Republican-led legislature, including House Speaker Thom Tillis of Cornelius, the documents show.<br />
<br />
Duke won't confirm or deny being a member. Duke has supported ALEC's past events, including spending $50,000 to sponsor a 2012 meeting in Charlotte, and might do so again, says spokesman Tom Williams.<br />
<br />
All six of the states in Duke's territory -- the Carolinas, Florida, Ohio, Indiana and Kentucky -- have Republican-majority legislatures, Williams notes, and five have Republican governors.<br />
<br />
"It's all about having a seat at the table as discussions are held, and sometimes supporting things and sometimes not," Williams says.<br />
<br />
Greenpeace and other groups say Duke's status matters because of ALEC's positions on renewable energy. Among them is a proposal that, critics say, would make it more expensive for owners of rooftop solar panels to pay utilities to use the electric grid.<br />
<br />
"Duke's customers deserve to know whether their utility stands with an organization that plans to attack homeowners in North Carolina who have installed solar panels," Greenpeace researcher Connor Gibson said by e-mail. Duke's membership would "prove," he said that the utility supports the ALEC proposal.<br />
<br />
ALEC lost support following the Trayvon Martin shooting in Florida last year for its support of "stand-your-ground" laws.<br />
<br />
Dozens of bills introduced in the N.C. legislature this year, including measures on voter identification and private school vouchers, reflected the group's positions, Raleigh's <a href="http://www.newsobserver.com/2013/05/06/2875525/private-group-carries-sway-in.html">News & Observer</a> has reported.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com7